Researchers analyzed 87,617 messages from 16 Telegram channels, 8 pro-Israel and 8 pro-Palestine, to understand the discourse on the Israel-Palestine conflict. The study used sentiment analysis, stance detection methods, and framing analysis to compare the two communities' language use. The results show that both sides use similar vocabulary related to death and victims, but with opposite emotional tones, indicating distinct discourse positions. --- Why it matters: This research matters because it provides insights into how different groups use social media to frame conflicts, which can inform strategies for mitigating online hate speech and promoting more constructive dialogue. Understanding the language patterns of opposing groups can also help develop more effective AI-powered moderation tools. Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21385