Researchers have developed a method to identify common ground between individuals in conflict using computational argumentation. They created a framework that represents each side's reasoning about peace agreements and merges these frameworks to find mutually acceptable agreements. The approach was tested on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, where it identified a 'Zone of Possible Agreement' based on citizens' reasoning. This method can help negotiators and conflict-resolution teams map feasible solutions grounded in public reasoning. --- Why it matters: This matters because it provides a new tool for conflict resolution, enabling negotiators to identify mutually acceptable agreements by understanding the subjective reasoning behind each side's positions. Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15634