Researchers have developed a tool called JuryProbe to help prevent false information from spreading. In factuality settings, where multiple judges agree on the accuracy of a claim without referencing any evidence, there's a risk that they're all missing something important. JuryProbe estimates this 'consensus risk' by analyzing how often these judges make similar mistakes. If it flags high-risk panels, it routes their decisions to the same judges with access to trusted references. This approach has been shown to reduce false accepts in experiments. --- Why it matters: This matters because it can help prevent the spread of misinformation online. By identifying when multiple judges are likely to be wrong, JuryProbe can trigger a more thorough review process, which can catch errors before they cause harm. Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20607